Unlock the Editor’s Digest totally free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Sam Bankman-Fried was confronted with tweets, media interviews and sworn testimony during which he repeatedly vouched for FTX’s governance and threat administration, as New York prosecutors started to cross-examine the previous tycoon over his cryptocurrency trade’s multibillion-dollar collapse.
The 31-year-old, who had earlier answered questions from his personal legal professionals, additionally admitted to calling a “particular subset” of crypto buyers “dumb motherfuckers” and conceded he had referred to his advocacy for crypto regulation as “simply PR” within the days main as much as his arrest final December.
He additionally admitted to writing “fuck regulators” to a reporter in November 2022.
Throughout questioning by assistant US legal professional Danielle Sassoon, Bankman-Fried was introduced with an audio recording of an interview during which he had claimed to not be “concerned in any respect” within the working of FTX’s affiliated hedge fund Alameda Analysis. Moments earlier, he acknowledged in testimony that he was nonetheless concerned in some discussions over the agency’s buying and selling technique.
The barrage of evidence got here because the trial towards Bankman-Fried entered its fifth week, having beforehand featured testimony from among the former billionaire’s closest associates and colleagues, together with Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang and Nishad Singh, all of whom are co-operating with prosecutors.
Below direct examination from his defence lawyer earlier on Monday, Bankman-Fried testified he believed FTX “had no holes on its stability sheet” simply days earlier than it collapsed out of business with $8bn of customer deposits missing.
Introduced with a tweet from November 7 2022 — 4 days earlier than the trade declared chapter — during which he mentioned “FTX is okay”, Bankman-Fried maintained that on the time the trade itself “had successfully no liabilities” and that there was “no gap by way of belongings”.
He added: “FTX didn’t do any investments with buyer belongings.”
Nonetheless, he conceded that at that time the trade was “on the verge of a liquidity disaster” as prospects have been withdrawing billions of {dollars} per day after the founding father of competing trade Binance forged doubt over FTX’s funds.
He additionally testified he had left it to Ellison, who ran Alameda Analysis, to hedge the buying and selling agency’s positions after its stability sheet deteriorated in the summertime of 2022. When up to date on that technique in September, Bankman-Fried mentioned he felt the corporate “may have hedged twice as a lot”.
Bankman-Fried, who has pleaded not responsible to all fees, was later requested by Sassoon whether or not he agreed that he knew “how you can inform a superb story”, to which he replied: “It will depend on what metric you utilize”. Earlier than FTX’s collapse, Bankman-Fried was one of many best-known figures within the nascent crypto trade, changing into a mainstay of media protection and hobnobbing with politicians and celebrities.
He added that he advised “what I believed was the reality in regards to the firm” to journalists, buyers, and the US Congress, earlier than being introduced with testimony to Congress from Might 2022 during which he mentioned FTX provided protections to prospects together with sustaining ample liquid belongings to all the time meet withdrawal requests. The trade was unable to fulfill such requests in November of that yr, and was compelled out of business.